Just please don't return it; we don't want any.
Just please don't return it; we don't want any.
Year 2 of the ITBA Fringe bloggers reviews is going to need a catchy name, however. Damn Time Out and Their FringeBinge name. They don't leave much left, do they.
SEXY COWGIRLIt is very hard not to have a good time "Invader? I Hardly Know Her". And trust me, I tried: for the first ten minutes of this musical I was skeptical, but by halfway through act 1 I had hit the point where I couldn't *not* enjoy myself. The premise: a man finds out--on his wedding day--that his wife is actually an alien who has been sent to find the crack into a fifth dimension via his toilet. He, the alien wife, a couple of robots, and some sexy crime-fighting clones must pool their resources before an evil demon from another dimension posesses them all.
Freeze!
ALIEN GIRL
Oh no you caught m--
Wait, what does a sexy cowgirl have to do with a
science fiction musical?
SEXY COWGIRL
It's sci-fi.
ALIEN GIRL
So?
SEXY COWGIRL
So what do you think was the gender of the guy who
wrote it?
ALIEN GIRL
Ah.
It's all very silly but self-mocking, and the lyrics by Jason Powell (who also plays the groom) were smart, witty, and often downright hysterical, which is something I feel we don't see enough emphasis on nowadays. I was surprised to find one of the most ingenious bits to be "Fetish Fighters", four crime fighters cloned to look like a sexy cowgirl, a sexy French Maid, a sexy Native American, and a sexy schoolgirl (the latter played by very funny standout Jessica Carollo). Also a standout is Alison Scarmella as a secret agent who has been tracking the alien bride, but the entire cast is great.
The only real criticism I would give to Powell (who also wrote book and music) in future versions is to give a stronger sense of focus to the main we're-trying-to-find-the-evil-fifth-dimension-being story, perhaps checking back in with that overarching plotline more often as we lose sense of it in all the fun we're having. Still, if you're looking for a good time, a light comedy, and some brilliant lyrics (and if you haven't been having good luck in your FRINGENYC picks so far), do catch Invader's final performance this Saturday.
http://www.fringenyc.org/basic_page.php?ltr=I
VENUE #16: The SoHo Playhouse
Sat 14 @ 10 Tue 17 @ 3 Fri 20 @ 9 Wed 25 @ 5:15 Sat 28 @ 12
MAN SHADOW
I wish I could figure out how to shadow light
this shadow lightbulb.
WOMAN SHADOW
I have a socket shadow.
MAN SHADOW
Can I shadow screw into it with my shadow
lightbulb?
WOMAN SHADOW
Shadow yes!
MAN SHADOW
Heh. Heh heh heh heh heh...
The shadow lightbulb represents my shadow--
WOMAN SHADOW
I KNOW WHAT IT REPRESENTS.
SHADOW.
God damned Android phone froze lost my first review...
Reviewing an abstract performance piece like Ground to Cloud isn't simple, as works like these seem to center as much on what you bring into the space as what you find onstage. On a surface level I enjoyed it very much, but on a deeper rung it seems to be missing something in its narrative.
Ground to Cloud is a shadow show, relying on monochomatic outlines created by actors and inanimate objects moving in front of strong diffused spotlights shining on a giant white sheet. The audience sees a collection of beautiful images that convey a man looking for a power source for his lightbulb, the interaction between a woman and dreamlike giants, and other visuals set to the sounds of a played saw (which I unfortunately could see much better than I could hear) and various sound effects. In me the early images evoked perfectly the all-too-real feeling of a blackout on the night of a storm, trying to blindly find your way towards any source of comforting light.
The execution was fantastic, particularly halfway through the piece where the audience members were instructed to put on red and blue glasses for 5 minutes. Let's talk about that: Using a simple and yet ridiculously effective setup--a red spotlight and blue spotlight placed right next to each other--shadow images were projected from slightly-left and slightly-right angles in order to convey a 3D shadow image. The shadows created closer to the red and blue spotlights had a greater variation in angles, causing them to seem to pop out at you more than those shadows created further from the red and blue spotlights. Amazing and beat the pants off of "Clash Of The Titans The Super $6.00 More 3D Experience", or so I'd presume.
My only complaint was the fuzzy story that was being conveyed; there was something in the beginning about the man searching for a power source for his lightbulb, and something at the end about the woman providing a socket to, uh, screw it into. But in the middle there was a bit about flying a kite that gets struck with electricity and a woman who is being chased by giant monsters that she's suddenly bigger than, and a mother figure that she keeps encountering. I could (and did) draw my own conclusions piece by piece but overall it was a bit muddled. At 30 minutes it's not a problem, but I wanted the play to be the 45 minutes the program promised or even longer (I don't blame them for the mismatch in timing; trying to lock in Fringe's running time and allowing buffer before you've even cast is a challenge). If they do expand Ground to Cloud--and I hope they do--I'd love to see it clarified and lengthened.
Ground To Cloud
http://www.fringenyc.org/basic_page.php?ltr=G
http://www.cimimarie.com/
VENUE #13: The New School for Drama Theatre
Thu 19 @ 7:30 Fri 20 @ 6 Sun 22 @ 4 Mon 23 @ 5:45 Thu 26 @ 8:30
WACKY CAST MEMBER 1
Let's sing about gun nuts, wont that be funny?
WACKY CAST MEMBER 2
Let's sing about drinking pee, that should be hysterical
right?
WACKY CAST MEMBER 3
Hey everyone, you should join me in a song about selling
a 14 year old's ovaries, that'd be CCCRRRRRAAAZZZZYYYY!
ANY PEOPLE IN AUDIENCE
WHO ARE ACTUALLY LAUGHING
Ha ha, my friends in this show are so hysterical.
Especially when they gave me free pot before the show
began.
Look, I love shock humor. I think making fun of redneck gun control is great. And I'm a big fan of breaking the fourth wall as much as possible. So why is it that I couldn't possibly recommend Terms of Dismemberment to anybody unless they came in already high? Perhaps it is because this musical feels like it was written in a single three hour marijuana-induced session, and nobody ever went back while sober to see if what they wrote was any good, never mind funny.
The plot, which confused the hell out of me, is something like this: a mother-of-two's husband recently died of something involving a card game, and she won't bury him for some reason, and has no way to make money to afford electricity or her daughter's yodeling and/or line dancing lessons. She gets a waitress job and there meets a guy who she might have some romantic relation with. He suggests making money through webinars (which for some reason in this musical means being an in person one-on-one positive reinforcement counselor). Also she moves in with her dead husband's brother who Believes In Guns, and she might have some romantic relation with him. And sells her daughters' hair and ovaries.
I'm sure the writers had good intentions of creating the Next Hilarious Quirky Edgy Musical. But the characters endlessly waffled motivations and desires from one scene to the next, and you could see the pointless songs straining to be funny. One lyric in particular lazily joked that there wasn't a third rhyme that they could find for the word "cuts", which, well, isn't true. It came across as if every time a cast member made other cast members laugh in rehearsal they put it into the show (an actor suddenly walks out onstage out of character and says "that's irony!" during one uneventful moment) and the result is a sloppy, directionless musical no matter how much tireless sweat the cast pours in.
I commend the team to keep writing musicals; one particularly hilarious number with singing and dancing ovaries shows the sort of comedy they were attempting for throughout the show. Hopefully they'll find a future stable project to rest their ideas and ambition onto. Terms of Dismemberment, unfortunately, is not it.
Terms of Dismemberment: A Musical with Heart...and Other Body Parts
http://www.fringenyc.org/basic_page.php?ltr=T
http://www.termsofdismemberment.com/
VENUE #12: Lucille Lortel Theatre
Wed 18 @ 4:30 Thu 19 @ 2 Mon 23 @ 8:45 Fri 27 @ 7 Sat 28 @ 2:30
1) Mad Men is popular.
So.

So every time you see that Shakespeare statue--and yes, it's the one you're thinking you remember seeing at some point or another--just remember. LINCOLN WAS SHOT so you could have that statue.
Or. Something.
JULIUS CAESARMy experience with Julius Caesar until now has been thus: In 7th grade, it was the first Shakespearean play I was taught because it was supposedly the easiest to understand. Then again in 9th grade, it was taught under the assumption that we *must* have all learned Romeo and Juliet in middle school, and so Julius Caesar would be an easy to understand follow-up. In both instances I came to the conclusion that Julius Caesar, while "easy to understand", was a rather uneventful play. Years later when I began to love Shakespeare I decided that there had to be something on the stage that didn't translate for me on the page, and if I ever had the chance to see a lauded production of the play I would make every effort to attend. I'm sorry to say that The Gangbuster's Theatre Company's "Julius Caesar: The Death of a Dictator" is not the production that is going to change my mind about the play.
Hi there. I'm both a well-known dictator and a
pretty boring play.
ORSON WELLES
What if I were to cut you down.
JULIUS CAESAR
WITH KNIVES?!? I HAVE A THING ABOUT KNIVES!
ORSON WELLES
No, in length. Down to 75 minutes.
JULIUS CAESAR
I would still be boring, but for much less time!
FRINGENYC
Damn.
What Director Lon Shanglebee has cleverly chosen to do is use Orson Welles' 100 minute adaptation, which eliminates several characters and drastically cuts down most of the events after Caesar dies, i.e. the entirety of Acts 4 and 5 are essentially boiled down to ~1 scene. While this allows for a Julius Caesar that fits more clearly with Gangbuster Theatre Company's motto of "Speed and Violence", it seems to be unaware of the fact that Welles' famous production was effective because it dressed the protagonists in Nazi and Facist Italy uniforms, drawing parallels between Caesar and Mussolini (which makes sense as the year of the production was 1937, and by the way, thanks Wikipedia).
Without any sort of deeper Welles-eque undercurrent in Gangbuster's production, all we see is a cast dressed in black, conspiring to kill someone we know very little about. Then watch him be killed. And watch the killers kill themselves. And all the time we don't feel sympathetic to the killed nor the killers because we don't really know who they are or what they really stand for. The director hasn't even seemed to really take a stand on whose side we should be on, which contributes to the blandness. Very little runs deep, and the fault is not of the fine actors. This is one of many Shakespearean productions that feels a need to push into an "updated" (Punk here) setting by dressing their actors in something "updated", but meanwhile does not make any sort of effort in updating who the characters are, layering new notions onto the story, or finding new meanings in Shakespeare's timeless text. Even the inclusion of Metallica songs seemed less to bring some new light to the play and more to bring recognizable words to the Fringe booklet listing.
Julius Caesar: The Death of a Dictator
The Gangbusters Theatre Company
http://www.fringenyc.org/basic_page.php?ltr=J
www.gangbusterstheatre.com
VENUE #17: HERE Arts Center- Mainstage Theater
Sat 14 @ 7* Sun 15 @ 1:45 Tue 17 @ 10 Fri 20 @ 4:15 Sun 22 @ 5:15








